MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1535502960 · doi:10.5772/20626

Exercise Guidelines for Women with Gestational Diabetes

2011· book-chapter· en· W1535502960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersLawson Foundation
KeywordsGestational diabetesMedicineObstetricsPregnancyGestationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low levels of physical activity may be contributing to the obesity and type 2 diabetes epidemics in women of child-bearing age. Physical activity levels may be evaluated using different tools but pedometers and accelerometers provide an accurate and objective method of measuring walking and other ambulatory activities. Physical activity levels based on step counts have been defined: <5,000 steps per day = sedentary, 5,000-7,499 steps per day = low active, 7,500-9,999 steps per day = somewhat active, 10,000-12,499 = active and www.intechopen.com Gestational Diabetes 340 12,500= highly active Pedometer data from the "American On the Move" study showed that women aged 18-39 years took approximately 5500 steps per day Similar results were found by Tudor-Locke et al. using accelerometer data from the 2005-2006 NHANES (Tudor-Locke et al., 2010). They reported that women took approximately 5,800 steps per day Interestingly, the authors also reported that normal weight women took more steps per day compared to overweight and obese women (6,486, 5,069 and 5,782, respectively). In Canada, accelerometer results from the 2007-2008 "Canadian Health Measures Survey" showed that women aged 20-39 years took nearly 9,000 steps per day. Again, obese women were less active compared to normal weight women. Noteworthy, studies conducted on populations that have a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity, like Japan and Australia, reported higher steps per day Achievement of public health recommendation (i.e 30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day, accumulated in bouts lasting at least 10 minutes, on at least 5 out of 7 days (Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology & ParticipACTION, 2010; WHO, 2010)) were also examined using accelerometers. Results showed that less than 5% of women of child-bearing age meet these recommendations Taken together, these findings showed that women of child-bearing age are inactive and suggested that being sedentary, and the prevalence of physical inactivity, may be contributing to the obesity and diabetes epidemics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it