Late Colonial Development in British West Africa: The Gonja Development Project in the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast, 1948–57
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article, se servant de la Machine antipolitique de James Ferguson comme d’un guide, étudie les intentions et les effets d’un projet d’arachides de l’après-guerre dans les Territoires du nord de la Gold Coast. Mais, l’article va plus loin que le discours sur lequel Ferguson s’est concentré essentiellement. Il évalue les racines matérielles du projet, y compris le besoin économique de produire des oléagineux et le besoin politique de faire obstacle à des changements sociaux rapides. Dans ce but, l’état colonial de la Gold Coast a dressé la communauté contre la société civile au nom du développement africain. L’idée de communauté formait ainsi une partie intégrale de la doctrine de développement de l’état colonial. Ces remarques contrastent avec la tendance actuelle à mettre sur le même pied communauté et société civile et de les dresser toutes deux contre l’état comme outils du développement humain. Cette analyse soulève ainsi des questions importantes sur la situation actuelle, quand l’industrie du développement essaye une fois encore de réconcilier transformation économique et harmonie sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".