MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1535527837 · doi:10.1109/i2mtc.2015.7151282

Fault feature extraction of planetary gearboxes under nonstationary conditions based on reassigned wavelet scalogram

2015· article· en· W1535527837 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaowang Chen, Zhipeng Feng, Ming Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsWaveletFault (geology)Time–frequency analysisFeature extractionInstantaneous phaseSIGNAL (programming language)Pattern recognition (psychology)VibrationFrequency domainComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Wavelet transformTime domainSignal processingArtificial intelligenceEngineeringAcousticsElectronic engineeringGeologyComputer visionPhysicsDigital signal processingTelecommunicationsRadarSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planetary gearboxes often run under time-variant conditions, thus resulting in nonstationary signals. How to extract fault features from nonstationary vibration signals is a key issue of planetary gearbox fault diagnosis. Considering the merits of reassigned wavelet scalogram, i.e. fine time-frequency resolution and free from cross term interferences, it is used to analyze the vibration signals in joint time-frequency domain. The effectiveness of reassigned wavelet scalogram in planetary gearbox fault diagnosis under nonstationary conditions is validated by both lab experimental and in-situ signals. For the lab experimental signals, the gear characteristic frequencies and their time evolving features are identified. From the comparison between normal and faulty signal analysis results, the sun gear fault is diagnosed. For the in-situ signals, their time-frequency structures are also resolved. According to the presence of periodical impulses and their repeating period, the planet gear fault is detected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207