MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1535634267 · doi:10.1029/2003pa000913

Evidence for an additional Heinrich event between H5 and H6 in the Labrador Sea

2003· article· en· W1535634267 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Harunur Rashid, Reinhard Hesse, David J. W. Piper

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleoceanography · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of CanadaMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie UniversityPolar Knowledge CanadaLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of ArizonaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyIcebergOceanographyMeltwaterSediment trapSedimentSea iceRadiocarbon datingGlacial periodGeomorphologyPaleontologyWater column

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An additional Heinrich ice‐rafting event is identified between Heinrich events 5 and 6 in eight cores from the Labrador Sea and the northwest Atlantic Ocean. It is characterized by sediment rich in detrital carbonate (40% CaCO 3 ) with high concentration of floating dropstones, high coarse‐fraction (% > 150 μm) content, and has a sharp contact with the underlying but grades into the overlying hemipelagic sediment. It also shows lighter δ 18 O Npl values, indicating freshening due to iceberg rafting and/or meltwater discharge. This event is correlated with Dansgaard‐Oeschger event 14 and interpreted as an additional Heinrich event, H5a. The thickness of H5a in the Labrador Sea reaches up to 220 cm. This additional Heinrich event has also been reported in cores PS2644 and SO82‐5 from the northern North Atlantic. With the recognition of H5a the temporal spacing between Heinrich events 1 to 6 becomes more uniform (∼7 ka).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaleoceanographySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207