MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1535686168 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-4172

Abstract 4172: Noncoding mutation analysis reveals previously unrecognized pathways in lymph node-invasive breast cancer

2014· article· en· W1535686168 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Dorman, Coby Viner, Ben C. Shirley, Peter K. Rogan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsPhytronix (Canada)Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA splicingBiologyGeneticsExonIntronBreast cancerGermline mutationExon skippingGeneMutationAlternative splicingCancerRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Large-scale DNA sequencing studies have elucidated genomic landscapes of breast cancer (BC) tumours to identify driver mutations and dysregulated pathways contributing to tumourigenesis. Reported somatic mutations largely consist of protein coding mutations, whereas analyses of mRNA splicing mutations have been limited, even though these mutations are prevalent in many genetic disorders. We conducted an independent study of 445 matched normal and BC tumour exomes from The Cancer Genome Atlas Consortium (TCGA) using software for large-scale prediction and validation of novel splicing mutations. A variant caller, Strelka, was used to detect somatic mutations by comparing matched tumour-normal genotypes. The Shannon Human Splicing Pipeline predicted 5 206 splicing mutations, of which 1 130 are classified as cryptic splice site variants, 1 355 and 2 721 as inactivating or weakening natural sites, respectively. We predicted 385 (90%) of 429 splicing variants reported by the TCGA. Software was developed for high throughput validation of these variants using matched RNA sequencing data and controls to confirm expected consequences due to the variant's effect on the strength of the cognate splice site: cryptic splicing (extension or truncation of an exon), exon skipping or intron inclusion attributable to missplicing. Statistical significance was computed based on counts of the expected isoforms relative to their occurrence in non-variant containing samples. The splicing mutations were found to be in genes previously implicated in BC (TP53, MLL3, CDH1, MAP3K1, PTEN, PIK3CA, GATA3 and RB1) as well as novel significantly mutated genes identified by the TCGA (CBFB, PIK3R1 and NF1). Pathway analysis of mutated genes based on splicing variants alone revealed overrepresentation of 29 pathways including 14 collagen, 4 extracellular matrix (ECM), and other pathways previously associated with BC such as the cell cycle or ERBB2 signaling. Many, but not all, of these pathways were shown to be overrepresented by the TCGA. Inclusion of splicing mutations revealed enrichment in 8 NCAM1 related pathways in samples with evidence of lymph node involvement, which was not observed in the lymph node-negative subset (p < 0.05). NCAM pathway-related mutations explain variability within significant components of the data, and are correlated with tumour stage and receptor status. Based on our findings, we hypothesize that NCAM1 and associated mutations contribute to tumour metastasis, whereas, overall, tumours are enriched for collagen/ECM mutations regardless of lymph node status. A non-negligible fraction of splicing variants are also predicted to overlap codons. We propose that comprehensive reporting of DNA sequencing data should consider both protein coding and non-trivial splicing analyses to avoid missing clinically-significant deleterious splicing mutations, which may contribute to novel metastasis-associated pathways. Citation Format: Stephanie N. Dorman, Coby Viner, Ben C. Shirley, Peter K. Rogan. Noncoding mutation analysis reveals previously unrecognized pathways in lymph node-invasive breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4172. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4172

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicRNA modifications and cancer→French-language works237,207→