Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le roman de Sergio Kokis Le maître de jeu propose une double réflexion sur l’éthique et l’écriture romanesque, et pose une question essentielle : comment écrire un récit de torture ? Au-delà de l’histoire et de ses personnages, cette étude du roman s’attardera au registre du corps du torturé, à interroger la façon dont on passe du témoignage (le récit) à l’écriture (le roman) et à voir comment la pensée éthique transforme la narration. Tenter de cerner ces éléments implique un désir de comprendre les enjeux éthiques et les problèmes romanesques qui sous-tendent cette histoire de torture. Cette réflexion se prolonge par une interrogation sur le bien et le mal, notions présentées à travers la pensée Nietzsche ou les romans de Dostoïevski lors des échanges — souvent ludiques ou ironiques — entre le narrateur et un visiteur qui prétend être Dieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".