MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1535760020

The effectiveness and efficiency of providing home care visits in nursing clinics versus the traditional home setting

2004· dissertation· en· W1535760020 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursing homesNursingMedicineFamily medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives . (1) Develop and implement a new model of home care delivery for home care services that would better serve post acute clients; (2) Evaluate this process by determining the effectiveness of the new model; (3) Suggest how the model would complement and be assimilated with the acute and community health care sectors; (4) Determine if the model is a more efficient way to use nursing resources; (5) Determine the satisfaction and acceptability of the clients and nursing staff with the new model. New service . Three nursing clinics were built, equipped and staffed to operate in three geographically different areas of a large Canadian city. The clinics served post acute, ambulatory Community Care Access Centre (CCAC) clients requiring wound dressings, intravenous therapy and other complex nursing care. Research design . Randomized control trial with initial data collection immediately post randomization and six weeks post discharge from hospital. Sample size . 99 Clients (45 experimental and 54 control), average age 50.8 years, eligible for CCAC services and retained for a 6 week period post CCAC discharge. Results . Study participants treated in a nursing clinic versus at home maintained their equivalent health status on eight health dimension and two summary mental and physical component scales of the SF-36. The average number of visits per clients in either venue was not significantly different. The average treatment time in the home was 46.4% longer (p < .001) than the clinic when travel and documentation time was included. This saving translates into a potential $10 million savings and the release of 146 full time equivalent RN resources, based on 6 million home care visits annually in Ontario. In addition, the satisfaction results reveal the home group was significantly less satisfied and inconvenienced waiting to be treated in the home. Implications . This study demonstrates that nursing clinics are an effective, acceptable and more efficient alternative for home visits for certain groups of clients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it