Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grâce aux recherches en archives et sur des sites archéologiques du XVIe siècle, la présence européenne ancienne dans le Nord-Est de l’Amérique du Nord est maintenant mieux documentée. Il devient donc possible d’établir des liens entre les assemblages d’objets européens de cette période mis au jour sur les sites amérindiens de l’intérieur du continent et de peut-être mieux comprendre comment l’arrivée de ces nouveaux venus et leur rencontre avec les Autochtones auraient pu affecter les populations en place. Venant s’ajouter aux récits de voyage et autres documents d’archives, ces vestiges matériels, malgré les limites qu’ils présentent, nous donnent un point de vue généré par les Amérindiens eux-mêmes qui peut être mis en rapport avec les textes européens. Ainsi, cet essai tente de mesurer l’intensité et l’ampleur de ces premiers contacts et de déterminer les principaux événements qui les ont entourés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.131 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".