MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1536096329 · doi:10.7202/018675ar

Un ange cornu avec des ailes de tôle de Michel Tremblay

2008· article· fr· W1536096329 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Claude Filteau

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans Un ange cornu avec des ailes de tôle, Michel Tremblay parle des livres qui ont marqué sa jeunesse en soulevant à ce propos des questions importantes: qu’est-ce que lire en «non-spécialiste»? comment peut-on être jaloux d’un personnage? pourquoi la logique fictionnelle ne s’accorde-t-elle pas avec la réalité? comment la fiction s’affranchit-elle des grands principes moraux tout en restant fidèle à la «vraie vie»? Michel Tremblay, à sa manière, apporte des réponses à ces questions en abordant la pertinence des émotions que peut éprouver le lecteur d’un point de vue esthétique et moral face à des textes aussi différents que Patira de Raoul de Navery, Agamemnon d’Eschyle, Bonheur d’occasion de Gabrielle Roy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207