MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1536096329 · doi:10.7202/018675ar

Un ange cornu avec des ailes de tôle de Michel Tremblay

2008· article· fr· W1536096329 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Claude Filteau

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans Un ange cornu avec des ailes de tôle , Michel Tremblay parle des livres qui ont marqué sa jeunesse en soulevant à ce propos des questions importantes: qu’est-ce que lire en «non-spécialiste»? comment peut-on être jaloux d’un personnage? pourquoi la logique fictionnelle ne s’accorde-t-elle pas avec la réalité? comment la fiction s’affranchit-elle des grands principes moraux tout en restant fidèle à la «vraie vie»? Michel Tremblay, à sa manière, apporte des réponses à ces questions en abordant la pertinence des émotions que peut éprouver le lecteur d’un point de vue esthétique et moral face à des textes aussi différents que Patira de Raoul de Navery, Agamemnon d’Eschyle, Bonheur d’occasion de Gabrielle Roy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207