MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1536422054

Nunavut well-baby record: modifying a standars tool for remote indigenous population

2014· article· pt· W1536422054 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sorcha Collins, Maya Nakajima, Geraldine Osborne, Laura Arbour

Bibliographic record

VenueANAIS DO CONGRESSO SUL-BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA DE FAMÍLIA E COMUNIDADE · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsGovernment of NunavutUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationIndigenousEnvironmental healthGovernment (linguistics)Population healthGastroschisisPregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducao: is Canada‘s most northerly and remote territory with a population of 35,591, of which 85% are Inuit. It leads the country for indicators of adverse perinatal outcomes (maternal smoking 80%, teenage births 20%), and rates of adverse early child health outcomes such as prematurity, infant mortality, and certain birth defects (heart defects, gastroschisis, orofacial clefts). Objetivos: To describe the development, content, and use of the Well-Baby Record (Nunavut WBR). The WBR is a modification of the Rourke Baby Record (www.rourkebabyrecord.ca), a validated evidence-based system for well-baby/child care from 1 week to 5 years widely used in Canada. Metodologia ou Descricao da Experiencia: To understand and improve early child health outcomes, the Government of Nunavut, with the University of British Columbia, initiated the development of a comprehensive maternal/child health information system, the Nutaqqavut (Our Children) Health Information System (NHIS). Careful assessment of local needs, including health care provider and lay stakeholder meetings with community involvement from key organizations (Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., Qaujigiartiit Health Research Centre), established broad support, and continues to contribute to database development, protection of privacy, potential data utilization for health promotion, and plans for dissemination of findings. Resultados: A series of small working groups decided on prenatal, perinatal and early child health variables to be documented from 16 weeks gestation to age 5 years. With permission and input from the authors, the Rourke Baby Record was modified to include Nunavut specific variables of nutrition, food and domestic security, birth defects, TB exposure, paternal information, and chronic childhood diseases such as lung infections, seizures, and hearing loss. The WBR enables data collection at 2, 6, and 12 months, 2 - 3 and 4 - 5 years of age, which is a significant component of the NHIS. Conclusao ou Hipoteses: The Well-Baby Record is a modification of a standard validated tool for a remote indigenous population in Canada‘s arctic. It is part of the NHIS, a larger initiative to help understand maternal/child health determinants, advance intercultural competence, and improve the health of Nunavut’s children. The model is adaptable to other community and public health systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANAIS DO CONGRESSO SUL-BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA DE FAMÍLIA E COMUNIDADESame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207