MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1536458656

Reading tween franchises : cross-media practices and the discourses of tween girlhood

2010· dissertation· en· W1536458656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIOE EPrints · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Articulation (sociology)ClothingReading (process)AdvertisingMedia studiesSociologyCross-culturalArtPolitical sciencePoliticsHistoryAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THESIS ABSTRACT
\nThe 'tween' age group, particularly preadolescent females between the ages of 8
\nand 12, constitutes a heavily targeted niche for the branding and cross marketing of
\nproducts. Consequently, books aimed at tween readers are often part of cross-media
\nfranchises that may include film and television adaptations, affiliated music albums,
\nonline fan clubs, video games, clothing, and cosmetics. In this context, representations
\nmay be adapted across a number of media forms, and conversely, responses to texts may
\nbe facilitated by engagement with diverse media. In light of these trends, this research
\nexplores how intersecting discourses of tween girlhood are negotiated through crossmedia
\npractices by both producers and consumers of tween franchises.
\nThe thesis begins with a review of research from the fields of children's literature
\ncriticism, cultural and media studies, girlhood studies, and New Literacies. Building on
\nthis review, I outline a theoretical and methodological frame rooted in theories of
\ndiscourse as articulated through multimodal design and cross-media play. The analysis
\ntraces a cultural history of key discourses in Anglo-American texts for and about
\npreadolescent girls. In the following chapters, two tween-oriented cross-media worlds,
\nThe Chronicles ofNarnia and Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, are used as case studies to
\nexamine the roles of multi modal design and cross-media play in the articulation of these
\ndiscourses of tween girlhood. Each case study addresses the design of franchise texts (i.e.
\nbooks, DVDs, tie-in texts); fan cultures related to these texts; and the responses of eightyear-
\nold participants during fieldwork in Toronto, Canada. The conclusion of this thesis
\ndiscusses the potential application of this doctoral study in future research on crossmedia
\ntexts and practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it