MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Organização flexível de documentos

2013· dissertation· pt· W1536461222 on OpenAlex
Tatiane Nogueira Rios

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicText and Document Classification Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisFuzzy clusteringComputer scienceData miningFuzzy logicInformation retrievalHeuristicCluster (spacecraft)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several methods have been developed to organize the growing number of textual documents. Such methods frequently use clustering algorithms to organize documents with similar topics into clusters. However, there are situations when documents of dierent clusters can also have similar characteristics. In order to overcome this drawback, it is necessary to develop methods that permit a soft document organization, i.e., clustering documents into dierent clusters according to dierent compatibility degrees. Among the techniques that we can use to develop methods in this sense, we highlight fuzzy clustering algorithms (FCA). By using FCA, one of the most important steps is the evaluation of the yield organization, which is performed considering that all analyzed topics are adequately identied by cluster descriptors. In general, cluster descriptors are extracted using some heuristic over a small number of documents. The adequate extraction and evaluation of cluster descriptors is important because they are terms that represent the collection and identify the topics of the documents. Therefore, an adequate description of the obtained clusters is as important as a good clustering, since the same descriptor might identify one or more clusters. Hence, the development of methods to extract descriptors from fuzzy clusters obtained for soft organization of documents motivated this thesis. Aiming at investigating such methods, we developed: i) the SoftO-FDCL (Soft Organization -Fuzzy Description Comes Last) method, in which descriptors of fuzzy clusters are extracted after clustering documents, identifying topics regardless the adopted fuzzy clustering algorithm; ii) the SoftO-wFDCL (Soft Organization -weighted Fuzzy Description Comes Last) method, in which descriptors of fuzzy clusters are also extracted after the fuzzy clustering process using the membership degrees of the documents as a weighted factor for the candidate descriptors; iii) the HSoftO-FDCL (Hierarchical Soft Organization -Fuzzy Description Comes Last) method, in which descriptors of hierarchical fuzzy clusters are extracted after the hierarchical fuzzy clustering process, identifying topics by means of a soft hierarchical organization of documents. Besides presenting these new methods, this thesis also discusses the application of the SoftO-FDCL method on documents produced by the Canadian continuing medical education program, presenting the utility and applicability of the soft organization of documents in real-world scenario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it