MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1536482319 · doi:10.7202/019137ar

Introduction à Kopernikus : Pistes de réflexion autour du sacré 

2008· article· fr· W1536482319 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Louise Bail

Bibliographic record

VenueCircuit Musiques contemporaines · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteure se propose d’examiner l’un des aspects les plus significatifs de l’univers de Claude Vivier, le sacré, en s’appuyant sur des éléments biographiques, ses écrits, son oeuvre en général, et plus spécifiquement l’opéra « rituel de mort » Kopernikus. Sont envisagés dans cet article deux aspects du sacré : le numineux et le merveilleux. Vie et oeuvre de Vivier, directement conditionnées l’une par l’autre dans l’imaginaire du compositeur, oscillent entre le numineux (moteur de la vie) et le merveilleux (moteur de l’oeuvre), entre deux représentations mentales, le sacrifice (du latin sacrare, « consacrer à une divinité ») et l’extase (du latin extasis, « être hors de soi ; égarement de l’esprit » : « ravissement »). Agni, le double du compositeur, personnage central et le seul nommément désigné dans l’opéra, évoque le numineux associé au concept de sacrifice. Alice, l’ombre d’Agni, symbole de l’imagination constamment sollicitée, représente le merveilleux associé au concept d’extase. Entre le numineux et le merveilleux, le sacrifice et l’extase, l’existence et l’oeuvre, s’installe un vide qu’il reviendra à la musique de combler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCircuit Musiques contemporainesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207