Integrating Performance Analysis in Software Product Line Development Process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter presents a comprehensive methodology for integrating performance analysis in the early phases of SPL model-driven development process, whose goal is to evaluate the performance characteristic of different products by generating and analyzing quantitative performance models [Tawhid & Petriu, 2008a, 2008b]. We start by adding generic performance annotations expressed in MARTE to the UML model representing the set of core reusable SPL assets. A model transformation realized in the Atlas Transformation Language (ATL) derives the UML model of a specific product with concrete MARTE performance annotations from the SPL model. The product derivation process binds the variability expressed in the SPL to a specific product, and also the generic SPL performance annotations to concrete values provided by the designer for this product. The proposed model transformation approach can be applied to any existing SPL model-driven development process using UML for modeling software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it