La politique du multiculturalisme est-elle compatible avec le nationalisme québécois?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans ce texte, l’auteur entend montrer que le nationalisme québécois ne s’oppose en rien à une politique de multiculturalisme. Dans la première partie, il fait valoir que ce que le nationalisme québécois rejette n’est pas le multiculturalisme en tant que tel, mais le type de multiculturalisme promu à l’intérieur de la fédération canadienne, qui peine à reconnaître la composition multinationale du Canada. Dans la seconde partie, il tente de répondre à l’objection selon laquelle nationalisme québécois et multiculturalisme seraient des options conflictuelles, non en raison de la politique canadienne sur le multiculturalisme, mais à cause du nationalisme québécois lui-même, qui, en voulant préserver l’identité nationale des Québécois, limiterait le degré d’ouverture du Québec à la diversité culturelle. Ce texte cherche à prouver que cette position n’est pas fondée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".