MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1536700515 · doi:10.1109/pes.2005.1489582

An overview of the operation of Ontario's electricity market

2005· article· en· W1536700515 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hamidreza Zareipour, Claudio A. Cañizares, Kankar Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005 · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricity marketElectricityBusinessEnergy marketIndustrial organizationEnvironmental economicsEconomicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ontario electricity market, which opened on May 1, 2002, consists of physical markets for energy and operating reserves as well as a financial market for transmission rights, administered by the independent electricity market operator (IMO). Bids for energy and operating reserves from inside Ontario are settled based on a uniform pricing mechanism; however, import/export of electricity and applicable operating reserves through 12 intertie zones from/to New York, Michigan, Minnesota, Manitoba and Quebec control areas are priced differently. Energy and operating reserves markets are designed based on two time-frames, pre-dispatch and real-time, as well as two optimization procedures, unconstrained and constrained. Financial transmission rights are auctioned for short-term (one month) and long-term (one year), and provide a limited risk-hedging mechanism for holders. In this paper an overview of the market structure, basic features and the operational aspects of the Ontario market is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005Same topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207