Ottawa Parmi les Technopoles Nord-Americaines: Perception des Entrepeneurs Locaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objectif que voir comment les dirigeants d'entreprises de haute technologie de la region d'Ottawa perçoivent leur ville parmi les villes du savoir nord-americaines. A partir d'une enquête realisee aupres d'une soixantaine d'entre eux, nous constatons qu'ils ont une opinion positive d'Ottawa en ce qui a trait, entre autres, a sa competitivite economique. De plus, les repondants considerent qu'Ottawa se classe avantageusement parmi les technopoles nord-americaines. Ceci corrobore nos travaux realises a partir de donnees statistiques. Este articulo tiene por objetivo analizar como los directivos de las empresas de alta tecnologia de la region de Ottawa perciben su ciudad frente a las tecnopolis norteamericanas. A partir de una encuesta realizada a cerca de sesenta de ellos, constatamos que tienen una opinion positiva de Ottawa en lo que respecta, entre otras cosas, a su competitividad economica. Ademas, los encuestados consideran que Ottawa se posiciona de una forma ventajosa frente a las tecnopolis norteamericanas. Esto corrobora nuestros trabajos realizados a partir de los datos estadisticos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".