Définitions et approches diverses de la religion populaire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lorsque, à partir des années 1970, la notion de religion populaire commence à attirer l’attention des chercheurs de différentes disciplines, plusieurs d’entre eux cherchent à définir les deux composantes de la notion et, ce faisant, contribuent à mettre en valeur la richesse de ses aspects conceptuels et méthodologiques. Selon l’optique retenue par les auteurs qui ont écrit sur le sujet, la religion populaire sera souvent définie en relation avec l’un des trois pôles suivants : 1- la religion officielle, cléricale et savante ; 2- le folklore, le paganisme et les superstitions ; 3- les conditions sociales. Le but de cet article consiste donc à analyser comment ces divers modes d’interprétation peuvent venir ajouter à la réflexion sur la polysémie du phénomène religieux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it