MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537074376 · doi:10.1002/ejic.201301065

<i>P</i>‐Terthienyl‐Functionalized Dithieno[3,2‐<i>b</i>:2′,3′‐<i>d</i>]phospholes

2013· article· en· W1537074376 on OpenAlexafffund
Chris Jansen Chua, Yi Ren, Monika Stolar, Shirley Xing, Thomas Linder, Thomas Baumgartner

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsChemistryChromophoreStackingPhospholeIntermolecular forceArylAlkylPhotochemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A series of dithienophospholes with different P ‐thienyl substituents have been synthesized and characterized. Alkyl groups at the 2,6‐positions of the scaffold were introduced for solubility, but were found to also prevent π stacking with this scaffold. Whereas a simple thienyl does not affect the overall photophysics of the dithienophosphole, the installation of terthienyl units creates a considerable subchromophore that can communicate through the phosphole‐typical σ*–π* orbital interaction with the main scaffold. The overall architecture of the terthienyl was also found to have a significant impact on the photophysics of the system. Although a heavily twisted, branched terthienyl does not allow for any intermolecular π‐stacking interaction, the exposed nature of a linear terthiophene does, and gives rise to the formation of excimers in solution, as evident in shifted emission properties as a function of the concentration. Time‐dependent DFT calculations have revealed that in this case, the terthienyl group becomes the main chromophore and the dithienophosphole only plays a supportive role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Inorganic ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207