MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537173688 · doi:10.5772/13932

Biomimetic Model Membrane Systems Serve as Increasingly Valuable in Vitro Tools

2011· book-chapter· en· W1537173688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneBiological membraneChemistryBiophysicsLipid bilayerMicelleBilayerMembrane fluidityVesicleModel lipid bilayerMembrane biologyIsothermal titration calorimetryBiochemistryLipid bilayer phase behaviorOrganic chemistryBiologyAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biological membranes contain a multitude of lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates unique for any given cell or organism, and are a critical component of many biological processes. Animal and cell cultures have been used to understand these biological processes at the membrane level and more traditionally, to assess toxicity. However, the complex composition does not allow understanding of the detailed role of each membrane component, such as individual lipid species. This insight can be obtained from using simplified model systems, which include various kinds of vesicles (unilamellar or multilamellar), micelles, monolayers at an air-water interface, planar lipid bilayers/black lipid membranes, bicelles (bilayered micelles) and supported bilayers. All systems allow detailed control of composition and experimental conditions, and have been used to mimic various different membrane types, such as mammalian and bacterial. Using various physicochemical techniques including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), isothermal calorimetry (ITC), electron spin resonance, fluorescence spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction, it is possible to investigate the mechanisms of membrane toxicity through differential changes in acyl chain melting temperature, membrane fluidity, and permeability of these different membrane models upon ligand binding. Moreover, the effects of ions (Na + , K + , Li + , Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Ba 2+ ), toxic heavy metals (Hg 2+ , Cd 2+ ) and a variety of drugs (e.g. Ellipticine for tumors and H1N1 virus or cyclosporine A to prevent graft rejection) have been evaluated on mammalian systems. For bacterial model membranes, the effects of antimicrobial peptides, antibiotics, the interaction of proteins with model membranes, and the insertion or reconstitution of membrane proteins into such systems have also been investigated. When interpreting the results, it is important to note that some models may be better representatives of the natural membrane than others, and consequently, some results more relevant than others. Factors to consider include -but are not limited to -lipid composition, membrane curvature, or ionic strength of the solution, which all impart certain characteristics on the membrane model, influencing the results. Thus, while a singlecomponent lipid model can be informative, it is important to consider its applications and limitations. Overall, this chapter will provide insight as to the different lipid models used to mimic mammalian and bacterial membranes and how they have been found to be effective and useful research tools. Future development of these membrane models to more closely mimic www.intechopen.com Advances in Biomimetics 252 the composition and complexity of the natural membrane will provide further insight into the mechanisms of membrane processes in biological systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it