MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Catholic Calumet: Colonial Conversions in French and Indian North America

2017· dataset· en· W1537249214 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe SHAFR Guide Online · 2017
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismTimelineHistoryAncient historyEconomic historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Catholic Calumet: Colonial Conversions in French and Indian North America. By Tracy Neal Leavelle. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. Pp. 256, appendix, notes, index. Cloth, $39.95).The Catholic Calumet: Colonial Conversions in French and Indian North America is a recent addition to the field published by the McNeil Center and the University of Pennsylvania Press. In this work, author Tracy Neal Leavelle (Associate Professor of History at Creighton University) examines the relationship between Jesuits and Algonquian-speaking people in the pays d'en haut and Illinois Country in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In particular, Leavelle focuses on the missionary efforts of the Jesuits, using the aspect of conversion as a way to study the changing world of native peoples. The result is an important new work that draws attention to an often-overlooked region.According to Leavelle, the study of Jesuit conversion in North America is often limited to the history of the Huron in the last half of the seventeenth century. By focusing on that timeline have too easily perceived a gradual decline in fervor... a decline that only accelerated in the eighteenth century (p. 200). But for the Ottawa, Ojibwe, Illinois, and other Algonquian-speaking Indians the encounters with Jesuits were far from over. By the 1660s Jesuits were rebuilding churches in the Upper Great Lakes. Missionary Gabriel Marist arrived in Illinois Country in 1698 and worked until his death in 1712. Jesuits established a formal parish in the area in 1719 and from there the Jesuits worked out into the countryside trying to convert the Illinois and Peoria Indians. Clearly the work of the Jesuits did not end with the decline of the Huron.Leavelle also suggests that scholars have been too rigid in their definition of conversion. Previous scholars have reduced conversion efforts into black and white categories: success or failure, Christian or native. Levealle argues that this framework is too rigid. In reality, Jesuit missionaries approached native peoples with a varying degree of understanding while native peoples' view of Christianity also changed over time. This was a period of great turmoil. Intertribal conflict intensified as native groups competed for dwindling resources. Disease killed entire families and villages. Groups were forced to migrate west in order to find hope for the future. In these cases the message of conversion was not simply about belief in a new deity; the act and meaning of conversion represented the possible end to chaos and confusion. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe SHAFR Guide OnlineSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207