Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si des hommes et des femmes ont transcrit des evenements historiques depuis l’invention de l’ecriture, une evolution importante a eu lieu au debut du vingtieme siecle. Auparavant, en raison de l’illettrisme generalise dans les classes plus pauvres, les faits historiques etaient consignes presque exclusivement par des erudits qui n’en avaient pas necessairement ete les temoins directs, ou qui n’etaient pas necessairement aux premieres loges de l’evenement. A la fin du dix-neuvieme siecle, l’education devint obligatoire pour tous dans de nombreux pays. En France, elle le devint en 1880, sous l’impulsion de Jules Ferry. Si les horreurs de la Grande Guerre ont pu s’incruster si profondement dans la conscience collective, c’est parce que meme le plus simple des soldats etait en mesure de produire des lettres, des journaux, des memoires, des romans ou d’autres documents. Dorenavant, la contribution ecrite des plus humbles temoins d’un evenement historique pouvait s’integrer a la comprehension globale de l’Histoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.161 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".