MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537435549 · doi:10.1038/ng.3302

PDE3A mutations cause autosomal dominant hypertension with brachydactyly

2015· article· en· W1537435549 on OpenAlexaff
Philipp G. Maass, Atakan Aydın, Friedrich C. Luft, Carolin Schächterle, Anja Weise, Sigmar Stricker, Carsten Lindschau, Martin Vaegler, Fatimunnisa Qadri, Hakan R. Toka, Herbert Schulz, Peter Krawitz, Dmitri Parkhomchuk, Jochen Hecht, Irene Hollfinger, Yvette Wefeld‐Neuenfeld, Eireen Bartels‐Klein, Astrid Mühl, Martin Kann, Herbert Schuster, David Chitayat, Martin G. Bialer, Thomas F. Wienker, Jürg Ott, Katharina Rittscher, Thomas Liehr, Jens Jordan, Ghislaine Plessis, Jens Tank, Knut Mai, Ramin Naraghi, Russell Hodge, M Hopp, Lars‐Olof Hattenbach, Andreas Busjahn, Anita Rauch, Fabrice Vandeput, Maolian Gong, Franz Rüschendorf, Norbert Hübner, Hermann Haller, Stefan Mundlos, N Bilginturan, Matthew A. Movsesian, Enno Klußmann, Okan Toka, Sylvia Bähring

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Genetics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhosphodiesterase function and regulation
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationMount Sinai Hospital
FundersDeutsche HochdruckligaDeutsche Stiftung für HerzforschungU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsElse Kröner-Fresenius-StiftungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAmerican Heart AssociationUniversity of Utah
KeywordsBrachydactylyBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMissense mutationMutationGeneticsMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations171
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature GeneticsSame topicPhosphodiesterase function and regulationFrench-language works237,207