MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537508979 · doi:10.1590/1984-9230747

A Efetividade dos Estrategistas da Responsabilidade Social Empresarial

2015· article· pt· W1537508979 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Paola Ometto, Sérgio Bulgacov, Márcia Ramos May

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganizações & Sociedade · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A importância do indivíduo na construção, manutenção e mudança das instituições caracteriza as teorias das práticas sociais. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar o perfil e o envolvimento dos estrategistas nas práticas de responsabilidade social. Parte-se da identificação do papel, agência, experiência e características dos praticantes que atuam na certificação ambiental de empresas brasileiras. A discussão dos resultados tem como base os conceitos de responsabilidade social corporativa e da teoria da estratégia como prática. A pesquisa foi feita em duas etapas. Na primeira, de caráter qualitativo e exploratório, um estudo de caso foi realizado na empresa Suzano Papel e Celulose. Na etapa seguinte, desenvolveu-se um levantamento quantitativo em 23 empresas, que representam 41% da população de empresas certificadas. O trabalho contribui ao destacar as diferentes dimensões do perfil dos praticantes e sua relação com a coletividade de práticas e seu envolvimento com o processo de certificação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganizações & SociedadeSame topicCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFrench-language works237,207