Agent-based collaborative project management system for distributed manufacturing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to address the dynamic requirements of project-based productions, this paper proposes a collaborative project scheduling and management system framework using a distributed multi-agent approach. This framework consists of three types of agents: L-Agents to enable integration with MRP/ERP and other legacy systems; P-Agents to schedule and manage the projects; and D-Agents to schedule, monitor and coordinate actual productions. These generic agents are dynamically deployed and customized at each location where a portion of the project is executed. An overall coordination is achieved through the communication and negotiation among these distributed agents. The proposed system enables project managers and others to effectively accommodate frequent engineering changes and other uncertainties while making an effective use of available distributed resources and fulfilling the customer requirements. A company manufacturing tools for sheet metal fabrications is used as an example to test and validate our prototype system. The prototyped system architecture is well suited for distributed problem solving applications and is adaptable to other application domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it