MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537712473

Northern British Columbia in an Era of Global Change

2015· article· en· W1537712473 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gary N. Wilson, Tracy Summerville

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthern review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyGateway (web page)Port (circuit theory)ProsperityResource (disambiguation)Natural resourceEconomyEcologyPolitical scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the profound transitions that are currently impacting northern British Columbia, a sparsely-populated, resource-rich region located in the province of British Columbia in western Canada.  For over a century, the economy of this region has revolved around the production of natural resources such as timber and minerals. More recently, northern British Columbia has become a key transportation gateway and corridor connecting resources and markets in North America with Asia. The development of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor promised to bring prosperity and growth to communities across northern British Columbia. While this has certainly been the case in the larger transportation hubs in the region, smaller communities have struggled to realize the benefits of new transportation infrastructure such as the container port in Prince Rupert. Moreover, the proposed development of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline, which will link the Athabasca oil sands project in northern Alberta with resource markets in Asia, has divided the communities and inhabitants of northern British Columbia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthern reviewSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207