Trend Toward “Harmonious Man” Education: Analyze Developing Direction of Collectivism Education in New Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collectivism education is the important content of moral education and quality education. At present, it became significant in moral education in schools. It is essential to strengthen and improve collectivism education in schools nowadays. At present, collectivism education facing the crisis of human is not no care of human question, but incomplete “being” of human. Educational practice let human requirement be suppressed by needs of society and ideology. Strengthening minds, but neglecting the spiritual education of human made spirit become empty and poor. “Harmony” became the real requirement of collectivism education and individual development. From “discover people” to “know people”, “return of human being” in collectivism education has changed the crisis of abandoning educational nature. The author thinks the development problem of collectivism education in the new period is period “new human being” development problem. From practice sight, collectivism education should get rid of one-dimension “rational man”. Trending toward “harmonious man” education is the inevitable choice of collectivism education development in the new period. Self-discipline and heteronomy are two routes to cultivate harmonious man.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".