Handbook Of Complex Percutaneous Carotid Intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Handbook on Complex Percutaneous Carotid Interventions Editors: Jacqueline Saw, J. Emilio Exaire, David S. Lee, Jay S. Yadav Section One: Clinical Experience 1. Epidemiology and Significance of Carotid Artery Stenosis Authors: Anthony Fung, MD and Jacqueline Saw, MD 2. Medical Therapy for Carotid Artery Stenosis Author: David S. Lee, MD 3. Carotid Endarterectomy: Techniques and Evidence-Based Medicine Authors: Joel Gagnon, MD and York Hsiang, MD 4. Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Trials: A Historical Perspective and Evidence-Based Medicine Authors: David S. Lee, MD and Jay S. Yadav, MD 5. Cerebrovascular Anatomy Authors: Ravish Sachar, MD and Samir Kapadia, MD 6. Noninvasive Imaging of the Carotid Artery Authors: J. Emilio Exaire, MD, Mikhael Mazighi, MD, Jacqueline Saw, MD and Alex Abou-Chebl, MD 7. Cerebrovascular angiography Authors: J. Emilio Exaire, MD, Jacqueline Saw, MD and Christopher Bajzer, MD 8. Current Indications for Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting Authors: Cameron Haery, MD and Deepak L. Bhatt, MD Section Two: Techniques of Carotid and Vertebral Artery Stenting 9. The Approach to Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting Authors: Jacqueline Saw, MD and Jay S. Yadav, MD 10. Equipments for Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting Authors: Jacqueline Saw, MD and J. Emilio Exaire, MD 11. Emboli Protection Devices Author: Jacqueline Saw, MD 12. Complications of Carotid Artery Stenting Author: Jacqueline Saw, MD 13. The Approach to Intracranial Carotid Artery Intervention Authors: Ivan P. Casserly, MD and Jay S. Yadav, MD 14. The Approach to Intracranial and Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenting Authors: J. Emilio Exaire, MD and Jacqueline Saw, MD 15. Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Authors: Mikhael Mazighi, MD, Qashim Bashir,MD and Alex Abou-Chebl, MD Section Three: Challenging Case Illustrations and Pearls 16. Case: Left Carotid Artery Stenting with a Challenging Type III Aortic Arch Author: Jacqueline Saw, MD 17. Case: Stenting of a Tortuous Left Internal Carotid Artery Author: J. Emilio Exaire, MD 18. Case: Stenting of a Critical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis with String Sign Author: Jacqueline Saw, MD 19. Case: Stenting of a Carotid Endarterectomy Patch Restenosis and Aneurysm Author: J. Emilio Exaire, MD 20. Case: Carotid Stenting with Slow Flow and Distal Embolization Author: J. Emilio Exaire, MD 21. Case: Acute Stroke Intervention with a Large Thrombotic Burden Author: Jacqueline Saw, MD 22. Case: Left Internal Carotid Artery Stenting in a Bovine Aortic Arch Author: David S. Lee, MD 23. Case: Right Carotid Artery Stenting Via Right Brachial Artery Approach Author: David S. Lee, MD 24. Case: Ostial Innominate Artery Intervention Author: David S. Lee, MD
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.091 | 0.095 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".