Revenu familial et participation aux etudes postsecondaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On etudie le rapport entre le revenu familial et la participation aux etudes postsecondaires afin de determiner dans quelle mesure les etudes superieures sont devenues l'apanage des familles aisees au Canada. L'analyse de deux ensembles de donnees semble indiquer que les membres de familles jouissant d'un revenu superieur sont plus susceptibles de frequenter l'universite, mais il s'agit la d'une tendance qui dure depuis longtemps et l'ecart de participation entre les membres des familles ayant les revenus les plus hauts et les plus bas a en fait diminue. Le lien entre revenu familial et participation aux etudes postsecondaires s'est resserre du debut au milieu des annees 1990, mais pour se relacher par la suite. Cette tendance indique le fait que des changements de politiques ont releve le maximum des prets consentis aux etudiants et augmente les autres types d'aide, mais seulement apres que les frais de scolarite ont commence a evoluer a la hausse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".