MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537865922 · doi:10.4000/cdlm.5239

Le retour de la ville portuaire

2010· article· fr· W1537865922 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claude Prélorenzo

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la Méditerranée · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Villes et ports connaissent des évolutions importantes qui sont concomitantes, pour partie convergentes mais parfois concurrentielles. Ainsi la désaffection des anciens bassins permet de reconstituer un contact urbain avec le littoral, la tertiairisation portuaire et le retour des passagers rapproche les services maritimes de ceux de la cité. Toutefois, le short shipping peut avoir besoin de darses aujourd’hui obsolètes et l’on doit s’interroger sur le sens d’opérations fortement fondées sur les loisirs. Au cours des cinquante dernières années, on a pu observer plusieurs types de modèles de recomposition : la reconstruction, le renouvellement du centre ville tel qu’illustré par Baltimore, la business city correspondant aux Docklands de Londres, la sensibilité écologique et paysagère de Montréal et enfin un modèle peut-être plus intégrateur avec Euroméditerranée à Marseille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de la MéditerranéeSame topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207