MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1538062480 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2015.7168673

Active nuclear magnetic resonance probe: A new multidiciplinary approach toward highly sensitive biomolecoular spectroscopy

2015· article· en· W1538062480 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Pourmodheji, Ebrahim Ghafar‐Zadeh, Sebastian Magierowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductorCMOSElectromagnetic coilVoltageSensitivity (control systems)AmplifierOptoelectronicsMagnetic coreChipLC circuitElectrical engineeringNoise (video)PhysicsMaterials sciencePlanarMicrocoilElectronic engineeringCapacitorComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a fully integrated CMOS stacked detection inductor and front-end receiver for NMR applications. Instead of a planar CMOS NMR detection coil, we propose a multi-turn differential stacked inductor with hollowed core. Such a structure makes available the possibility of introducing minute analyte samples directly within the sensing coil with ensuing boost in NMR measurement sensitivity. Physical simulations of the hollowed inductor stack are used to verify the superiority of a differential coil topology. The front-end receiver contains LC pre-amplification, low-noise amplifier (LNA) and voltage buffer. Both the differential stacked detection inductor and front-end receiver are designed for 300 MHz NMR settings. The front-end receiver achieves an input referred noise of 780 pV/√Hz and voltage gain of 43 dB. The core of the LNA draws a DC current of 3.4-mA from a 1.6 V supply voltage. The chip is designed in a 0.13-μm CMOS technology and occupies an area of 1 mm × 2 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207