Bibliographic record
Abstract
La pratique thérapeutique d'un groupe d'intervenants caractérisée par une approche humaniste de la thérapie est analysée sous l'angle d'une action culturelle innovatrice. Dans le cadre général d'une sociologie de l'action sociale et des mouvements sociaux, une telle action culturelle peut devenir un élément moteur dans la constitution d'un mouvement socio-culturel sur la base tie l'affirmation d'une plus grande intégrité de la personne humaine dans divers secteurs de vie. Le caractère le plus innovateur de la pratique thérapeutique examiné est celui d'une pragmatique communicationnelle qui remet en cause le rapport théorie - pratique et aussi le rapport professionnel - client des interventions plus traditionnelles dans le domaine de la santé mentale. Cette remise en cause se distingue par ailleurs d'une position contre-culturelle de rupture en se situant davantage dans un rapport social conflictuel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.046 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".