MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1538382964 · doi:10.1002/9781444315196.ch11

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Pregnancy

2010· other· en· W1538382964 on OpenAlexaff
Denice S. Feig

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminMedicineGlibenclamidePregnancyPolycystic ovaryGestational diabetesGlipizideType 2 diabetesGlycemicTolerabilityObstetricsInternal medicineInsulinDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyInsulin resistanceGestationAdverse effectBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is increasing interest in the use of oral hypoglycemic agents in pregnancy. Glyburide (glibenclamide) and metformin are unlikely to be teratogenic. Studies show that metformin crosses the placenta, whereas glyburide does not. Metformin improves ovulation rates in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and preliminary data suggest that it may decrease spontaneous abortions and gestational diabetes (GDM) in these women when used in pregnancy. Glyburide and metformin have shown equivalent glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in randomized controlled trials when compared with insulin, in women with GDM. However, questions remain regarding their use. Traditionally, pregnant women with Type 2 diabetes or GDM have been managed with insulin but this practice may change in the light of recent trial data. There are few data on the use of PPAR-gamma agonists in pregnancy. Tolerability is likely to be an issue with the use of alpha glucosidase inhibitors. Glyburide, glipizide and metformin appear compatible with breastfeeding, but are still not universally recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→