On the Future of the Humanities: Interview With Professor Mircea Flonta, Epistemologist and Philosopher of Science
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the Future of the Humanities: Interview With Professor Mircea Flonta, Epistemologist and Philosopher of Science Authors Mircea Flonta Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania Beatrice Popescu Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania Andrei Simionescu-Panait Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania Abstract No abstract available. PDF HTML Article info Impact Citations How to Cite License Published at 29. May 2015 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i2.999 Issue: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2015) Section: Interview Share: Z Flonta, M., Popescu, B., & Simionescu-Panait, A. (2015). On the Future of the Humanities: Interview With Professor Mircea Flonta, Epistemologist and Philosopher of Science. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i2.999 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 International License. PlumX Dimensions Views: Total Abstract PDF HTML 466 218 190 58 Downloads: Download data is not yet available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it