Observations of Mercury's northern cusp region with MESSENGER's Magnetometer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The magnetic cusp of a planetary magnetosphere allows solar wind plasma to gain access to the planet's magnetosphere and, for Mercury, the surface. From measurements by the MESSENGER Magnetometer we have characterized the magnetic field in the northern cusp region of Mercury. The first six months of orbital measurements indicate a mean latitudinal extent of the cusp of ∼11°, and a mean local time extent of 4.5 hrs, at spacecraft altitudes. From the average magnetic pressure deficit in the cusp, we estimate that (1.1 ± 0.6) × 10 24 protons s −1 bombard the surface over an area of (5.2 ± 1.6) × 10 11 m 2 near the northern cusp. Plasma pressures in the cusp are 40% higher when the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) is anti‐sunward than when it is sunward. The influence of the IMF direction does not overcome the north‐south asymmetry of Mercury's internal field, and particle flux to the surface near the southern cusp is predicted to be a factor of 4 greater than in the north. The higher particle flux impacting the surface in the south should lead to a greater exospheric source from the south and a higher rate of space weathering than in the area of the northern cusp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".