MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539031503

A comparative study of animal health welfare practices.

2012· article· en· W1539031503 on OpenAlex
Vijay Kumar, Birbal Singh, Rajesh Kumar, P. Dwivedi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Field Veterinarians · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock Management and Performance Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVeterinary medicineFoot-and-mouth diseaseWelfareMedicineEnvironmental healthAnimal welfareSocioeconomicsRural areaQuarter (Canadian coin)Animal healthVaccinationHealth careGeographyEconomic growthBiologyOutbreakPathologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study was conducted to assess the animal health welfare practices followed by farmers of Madhubani district of Bihar. In comparison to farmers in rural areas, periurban farmers had practiced more vaccination protocol for their animals for ailments like Hemorrhagic septicaemia, Foot and Mouth disease and Black quarter. Twenty five per cent of farmers in rural area and 41.6 per cent in peri-urban were followed vaccination against HS, FMD and BQ diseases. Care of milch and draught animal was satisfactory from welfare point of view while care of dry animal was poor as perceived by veterinary officers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it