MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539036470

Unamuno en el crisol, 1895-1912: la elaboración de la dialéctica abierta

2009· article· es· W1539036470 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGredos (University of Salamanca) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Philosophy and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContradictionDialecticHumanitiesPhilosophySoulLiteratureArtEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[ES] La primera indicación concreta en la obra de Unamuno de lo que sería la dialéctica abierta se expone en En torno al casticismo (1895): "Es preferible, creo, seguir otro método: el de afirmación alternativa de los contradictorios; es preferible hacer resaltar la fuerza de los extremos en el alma del lector para que el medio tome en ella vida, que es resultante de lucha" (vol. I: 784). Sin embargo, todavía faltaban arios de reflexión y de angustia espiritual para que se logrará plenamente en Del sentimiento trágico (1912). Este ensayo presenta un esbozo de esa trayectoria de la contradicción a la dialéctica. Paso a paso, Unamuno construye todo un lenguaje filosófico y metafórico para describir un sistema dinámico, una corriente que no se tiene que estancar para ser comentada y descrita. Para 1908 empieza a reescribir su "Tratado del amor de Dios" en una dialéctica abierta, elaborando en cada paso la filosofía de la tensión creativa. El "Tratado" se convierte en Del sentimiento trágico al terminar la transferencia de contradicción en dialéctica abierta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it