Unamuno en el crisol, 1895-1912: la elaboración de la dialéctica abierta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[ES] La primera indicación concreta en la obra de Unamuno de lo que sería la dialéctica abierta se expone en En torno al casticismo (1895): "Es preferible, creo, seguir otro método: el de afirmación alternativa de los contradictorios; es preferible hacer resaltar la fuerza de los extremos en el alma del lector para que el medio tome en ella vida, que es resultante de lucha" (vol. I: 784). Sin embargo, todavía faltaban arios de reflexión y de angustia espiritual para que se logrará plenamente en Del sentimiento trágico (1912). Este ensayo presenta un esbozo de esa trayectoria de la contradicción a la dialéctica. Paso a paso, Unamuno construye todo un lenguaje filosófico y metafórico para describir un sistema dinámico, una corriente que no se tiene que estancar para ser comentada y descrita. Para 1908 empieza a reescribir su "Tratado del amor de Dios" en una dialéctica abierta, elaborando en cada paso la filosofía de la tensión creativa. El "Tratado" se convierte en Del sentimiento trágico al terminar la transferencia de contradicción en dialéctica abierta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".