MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539056513 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2014.7048521

A novel multi-loop self-tunning adaptive PI control scheme for switched reluctance motors

2014· article· en· W1539056513 on OpenAlexaff
Rasoul M. Milasi, Mehrdad Moallem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitched reluctance motorControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Electronic speed controlAdaptive controlPID controllerComputer scienceNonlinear systemMachine controlMagnetic reluctanceControl engineeringTorqueEngineeringControl (management)Temperature controlPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A self-tunning adaptive control scheme for application to Switched Reluctance (SR) Motors is investigated in this work. The control gains of the proposed Pi-based control scheme are functions of the motor current and speed error signals. A second order nonlinear model of an SR Motor is considered to design the controller. The model is linearized around a nominal operation point to tune the controller. Simulation results verify the superior performance of the proposed adaptive speed control method in comparison with the conventional PI control technique. In specific, the results show that the control performance is satisfactory over a wide range of operating points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207