MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539061963 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2003.1272520

Musical pitch tracking using internal model control based frequency cancellation

2004· article· en· W1539061963 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenyu Zhao, Lyndon J. Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Time–frequency analysisFundamental frequencyIdentification (biology)Representation (politics)Pitch detection algorithmPolyphonySpeech recognitionTracking (education)Filter (signal processing)AcousticsAlgorithmComputer visionSpeech processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for pitch estimation of musical sound signal is presented in this paper. This method is based on the behavior of a notch filter in an error feedback system, and was first developed for identification of periodic signals with uncertain frequency. Unlike many previous methods, which are based on frequency representation in time window of the music signal, our algorithm is based on instantaneous 'measurements' of the frequency in real-time. Because of the high accuracy of the frequencies and the magnitudes we obtained, this method may also be used to verify the types of the instruments and even the vibratos. Simulation results show that the presented approach operates reliably in monophonic case with a highly accurate frequency estimation. The same method has been extended to the polyphonic setting. At present, we are restricting input with a relatively strong fundamental frequency. This paper is a progress report, we hope to extend our work greatly in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207