MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539212378 · doi:10.1002/9781118368909.ch12

Remote sensing of lake and river ice

2014· other· en· W1539212378 on OpenAlexafffund
Claude Duguay, Monique Bernier, Yves Gauthier, Alexei Kouraev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsGDG EnvironnementUniversity of Waterloo
FundersJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCanadian Space AgencyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsSea iceCryosphereArctic ice packArcticSnowAntarctic sea iceShelf iceIce streamGeologyRemote sensingSea ice thicknessEnvironmental scienceClimatologyOceanographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter provides an overview of the recent progress on remote sensing of lake and river ice. For lake ice, topics reviewed comprise the determination of: ice cover concentration, extent and phenology; and ice types. It also includes ice thickness and snow on ice; snow/ice surface temperature; and grounded and floating ice covers on shallow Arctic and sub-Arctic lakes. Regarding remote sensing of river ice, topics covered include: the determination of ice extent, ice phenology, ice types, ice jams, flooded areas, ice thickness, and surface flow velocities. It also includes the incorporation of SAR-derived ice information into a GIS-based system for river-flow modeling and flood forecasting. The chapter concludes with an outlook on anticipated developments in light of recent and upcoming satellite missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207