MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539290487 · doi:10.7202/005080ar

Les chômeurs de longue durée de plus de 45 ans : entre exclusion et réflexivité

2002· article· fr· W1539290487 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martine D’Amours, Frédéric Lesemann, Marc-André Deniger, Éric Shragge

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente quelques résultats d'une recherche fondée sur les récits de vie de 30 chômeurs et chômeuses de longue durée de plus de 45 ans. Pour ces personnes modelées par une société salariale intégrée autour du travail et dotée de formes familiales et de politiques sociales associées à l'État-providence, le chômage de longue durée est un échec et une trahison. Alors que le « contrat » initial leur promettait la retraite légitime au bout d'une vie de labeur, la perte d'emploi durable les condamne au statut d'assisté social et leur laisse un « fossé » de dix à quinze ans à combler avant la retraite légitime. Plus que la pauvreté, c'est la perte de statut qui les marque, car elle porte atteinte à leur identité. Certains s'épuisent à tenter de reconquérir un statut de travailleur, d'autres tentent de trouver de nouvelles identités hors du travail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207