The Novel in English as Paradigm of Canadian Literary Identity: From Francis Brooke to Sara Jeannette Duncan.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[ES] Esta tesis doctoral se centra en el género de la novela canadiense en inglés como paradigma de la identidad literaria de Canadá en el período que abarca desde Frances Brooke (el autor británico y residente temporal canadiense que escribió la primera novela canadiense en Inglés, La Historia de Emily Montague, publicado en 1769) a Sara Jeannette Duncan dado el papel pionero de su obra. El Imperialista, publicado en 1904, como hito en la evolución del género en Canadá hacia la modernidad. Con el fin de examinar el carácter paradigmático de la novela en inglés como representante de la identidad literaria de Canadá, otros autores que han contribuido al género durante este período se incluyen, no para apoyar las ideas prevalecientes sobre la identidad literaria canadiense en general, independientemente del género y / o el origen étnico , sino para cuestionar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".