New Cured-In-Place Gasket Technology Using UV-Cured High Performance Elastomers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Cured-In-Place Gaskets have been demonstrated as a viable, economical sealing choice for a number of automotive applications. Historically, this market has been limited by material choice, which has almost exclusively been the domain of liquid silicone (VMQ) and polyurethane (PU). New technology has been developed which expands the choices of elastomers that can be used in Cured-In-Place gaskets. Seals made with high performance elastomers such as ethylene acrylic elastomers (AEM) and fluoroelastomers (FKM) can now take advantage of this “efficient” process. These materials can be robotically dispensed using equipment similar to what is used in the “hot melt” adhesives industry and then cured with a UV-light source. These UV-cured seals exhibit mechanical properties similar to what their traditionally cured alternatives show and still maintain the excellent heat and fluid resistance of these polymers. These compounds have little or no filler and no adhesive is used, making them ideal choices for applications that require a low level of contamination. This technology has been shown to work with a number of elastomeric families of polymers.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">In this paper this new technology will be introduced and relevant properties of UV-cured elastomers will be reviewed.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it