The Gentlemanly Order & the Politics of Production in the Transition to Capitalism in the Home District, Upper Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Few have examined the class politics of pre-Rebellion Toronto in any detail; a vocabulary of class born in an industrial setting appears poorly fitted to an agrarian colony where production took place in small workshops of independent journeymen and apprentices under the supervision of master craftsmen. This article, in contrast, examines the transformations in class relations of the period in a framework derived from Cain & Hopkins theory of “Gentlemanly Capitalism.” It examines the creation of the three “fictitious commodities” (money, land, and labour) that Polanyi places at the heart of the “Great Transformation” in the context of the “Gentlemanly Order” being constructed by Upper Canada’s elite. This Gentlemanly Order was corporate in nature. The article concludes with an analysis of class conflict that resulted in the era, in particular in the building trades, where workers helped form a province-wide “Mechanics Association.” Resume Peu ont examine la politique des classes de la periode de pre-rebellion a Toronto en quelques details; un vocabulaire de classes ne dans un cadre industriel a paru mal accorde a une colonie agrarienne ou la production a eu lieu dans des petits ateliers de voyageurs independants et d’apprentis sous la supervision des maitres d’œuvre. Cet article, en revanche, examine les transformations dans les relations de classes de la periode dans un cadre provenant de la theorie Cain et Hopkins de « capitalisme de bonne grâce ». Il examine la creation de trois « commodites hypothetiques » (argent, terre, et main-d’œuvre) que Polanyi place au cœur de la « grande transformation » dans le contexte de « l’ordre de bonne grâce » etabli par l’elite du Haut-Canada. Cet ordre de bonne grâce est de nature collective. L’article conclut avec une analyse des formes de conflits de classes qui ont eu lieu, a cette epoque-la, en particulier dans les metiers du bâtiment, qui ont aide a former une « association de mecanique » dans l’ensemble de la province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".