MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A case of monilethrix caused by novel compound heterozygous mutations in the desmoglein 4 (DSG4) gene

2011· article· en· W1539577732 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Farooq, Masaaki Ito, Munekazu Naito, Yutaka Shimomura

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHair Growth and Disorders
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompound heterozygosityGeneGeneticsMutationDesmoglein 1DermatologyMedicineBiologyAntibodyAutoantibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monilethrix is a rare condition characterized by a hair shaft anomaly known as beaded hair. It can show either an autosomal dominant or an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. The autosomal dominant form of monilethrix is caused by mutations in the basic hair keratin genes KRT81, KRT83 or KRT86, while the autosomal recessive form results from mutations in the desmoglein 4 (DSG4) gene. We define the molecular basis of monilethrix in a Japanese patient who has had sparse and fragile scalp hairs since birth. We performed mutation analysis of candidate genes. In addition, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assays and immunofluorescence studies in cultured cells to investigate the functional consequences caused by a mutation. Mutation analysis resulted in the identification of novel compound heterozygous mutations, c.624delG (p.M208IfsX4) and c.2468G>A (p.W823X), in the DSG4 gene of the patient. Furthermore, we show that the mutant DSG4 protein with the mutation p.W823X severely affects the affinity to plakoglobin protein, which may contribute to disruption of desmosomes in the patient's hair shaft. Our results further underscore the crucial role of the DSG4 gene in differentiation of the hair shaft in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicHair Growth and DisordersFrench-language works237,207