MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539621610 · doi:10.7202/044263ar

Mémoires et autobiographie dans les Souvenances canadiennes de Henri-Raymond Casgrain

2010· article· fr· W1539621610 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Manon Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Souvenances canadiennes de Henri-Raymond Casgrain sont un texte inédit de 1 122 pages rédigées entre 1899 et 1902 dont il convient, après 110 ans, à défaut de n’avoir pu jusqu’ici être publié pour respecter la volonté même du mémorialiste, d’analyser la pertinence mémoriale et autobiographique. Sur le plan du contenu, l’oeuvre ne révèle rien de nouveau aux historiographes de la littérature, sinon la modernité des opinions de Casgrain sur l’importance pour les intellectuels québécois d’élargir leurs horizons en voyageant, et sur les aspects éthiques de l’industrialisation et de l’impéralisme américain. L’étude du plan formel est beaucoup plus révélatrice. Ces pages naviguent constamment à la jonction des attentes épistémologiques propres soit au genre mémorial soit à celui de l’autobiographie. Le transfert de la mémoire et la transmission des impressions de vie se font presque sans tracé critique. Au point où, lorsque le mémorialiste devient littéralement aveugle, l’oeuvre s’anéantit elle-même, implose, car elle s’arc-boute encore plus sur un copier-coller de textes antérieurs dont la mémoire est dépassée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207