MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539713333

The Special Scholarship “The Government of Romania”

2005· article· en· W1539713333 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adriana Pietrareanu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Union Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipGovernment (linguistics)Public administrationPolitical scienceEuropean unionAdministration (probate law)PoliticsOrder (exchange)LawEconomicsEconomic policyFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Special Scholarship “THE GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA” is a real chance for those who want to build a European career here, in Romania. Thinking of the accession of Romania to the European Union, it is necessary to reform the standards of its structures in all fields. The Special Scholarship “The Government of Romania” aims to make the public servants professionals to create a modern and transparent public administration, a European one, at the citizen’s disposal. The scholarship covers many sectors, such as: economics, law, European studies, public administration, communication, diplomacy, political studies, international relations, engineering, education, agronomy, national defense, public order, and sociology. Concretely, the Government of Romania will finance scholarships for the Romanians who want to study in famous universities from the Western Europe, Canada or USA The scholarship beneficiaries bind themselves to come back to Romania, to work as managers in the management public systems for a minimum period of three to five years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journalSame topicEuropean Union Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207