Potato protein isolate‐based biopolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Thermal processing of two potato protein isolates (PPIs) with glycerol as a plasticizer was explored in this study. The PPIs were pretreated by alkali or alkali under reducing conditions. The PPIs before and after pretreatment were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, differential scanning calorimetry, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The effects of plasticizer content and pretreatment on mechanical and thermo‐mechanical properties of the compression‐molded biopolymers were studied. The highest tensile strengths obtained were 20–25 MPa and the biopolymer can be brittle or ductile depending on the plasticizer contents. The molecular weight and protein structure of the PPIs markedly affected the resultant biopolymers’ static and dynamic mechanical properties. The pretreatment of PPIs caused distinctly different changes in the mechanical properties of the two PPIs. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.2015,132, 42723.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".