MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539832159 · doi:10.1109/icc.1999.767980

Joint source-channel decoding of entropy coded Markov sources over binary symmetric channels

2003· article· en· W1539832159 on OpenAlexaff
K. P. Subbalakshmi, J. Vaisey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsSoft-decision decoderBinary numberComputer scienceAlgorithmMarkov processEntropy (arrow of time)Channel (broadcasting)Binary symmetric channelMarkov chainJoint (building)Maximum a posteriori estimationSynchronization (alternating current)MathematicsChannel codeMaximum likelihoodTelecommunicationsStatisticsArithmeticEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an optimal joint source-channel, maximum a posteriori, decoder for entropy coded Markov sources transmitted over noisy channels. We introduce the concept of incomplete and complete states to deal with the problem of variable length source codes in the decoder. The proposed decoder is sequential, thereby making the expected delay finite. When compared to the traditional decoder, the proposed decoder shows a maximum improvement, of about 4 dB in a modified signal to noise ratio and an improvement of 21.95% in percentage of bits that are received in an out of synchronization condition, for a simple test source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207