MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1540327926

The Rescue of Jerusalem: The Alliance between Hebrews and Africans in 701 BC

2003· article· en· W1540327926 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abraham Rzepkowicz

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œWestern journal of black studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssyriaHebrewsAncient historyChristianityHumanityHistoryBattleEmpireAnnalsFellMiddle EastAdam and EveAllianceClassicsTheologyPhilosophyArchaeologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author: Henry T. Aubin Doubleday Canada: Toronto ISBN: 0-385-659-12-1 Price: $27.55 After a hiatus of nearly a millennium, Jerusalem has once again become a major focal point in the ongoing history of humanity. With the end of the Crusades, Europe and the Middle East, Christianity and Islam, turned their attention to other issues and other locales. As their respective empires and caliphates rose and fell through the centuries, Jerusalem was relegated to provincial insignificance, though it continued to serve as a beacon for the monotheistic religions whose roots, whether direct or indirect, were planted there. Mr. Aubin, as he develops his thesis in The Rescue of Jerusalem, challenges us to picture in our minds the potential scenario wherein all this emphasis on Jerusalem and the spiritual legacy engendered there would never have made any imprint beyond perhaps an archaeological footnote. It would be a piece of trivia in the annals of a civilized world totally unrecognizable and essentially inconceivable to modern man. Such was the possibility in 701 BCE, when the Assyrians under Sennacherib once again invaded the Near East to put down another local attempt at rebellion. This unstoppable Assyria, the most extensive empire to come out of Asia, came to put down insurrection and disloyalty with cruel devastation and inexorable exile. Only a few decades earlier, the rebellious Northern Kingdom of Israel had met such a fate, giving rise to the concept of the Ten Lost Tribes which lingers to this day. When King Hezekiah of Judah attempted to shake off the suzerainty of Assyria, he brought his kingdom to the brink of a similar fate. As Mr. Aubin points out, in 1998, The Quarterly Journal of Military History asked 37 historians to identify the military engagement of greatest historical import. Among the suggestions, was the Greek victory over the Persians and the English victory over the Spanish Armada. Just imagine the course of human history had the outcome of these events been different. What would history have been like had Sennacherib not withdrawn from the gates of Jerusalem? Going along with the argument of Professor William H. McNiell, author of The Rise of the West, the journal agreed with his view: Surely, there is no greater might have-been-in all recorded history. What had saved Judah? Mr. Aubin spends the bulk of the book investigating this intriguing question. As indicated by his citations from many scholarly sources and more than 100 pages of footnotes, he deals in depth, both historically and textually, with the Biblical, Assyrian, and Greek sources. The Assyrian sources, whether documentary or bas-relief sculpture, speak of a great victory in an obviously self-serving manner. As the author points out, the failure to indicate the capture of Jerusalem, an obviously key target as the capital of the rebellious province, speaks for itself. The Biblical accounts of an avenging angel slaughtering the invading army, in a literal understanding of the passages, or a plague decimating the forces in a metaphorical approach, both seem too overtly a theological interpretation seeking to discern Divine intervention in the events which were unfolding. The need for the Assyrians to withdraw and address unrest in Babylonia does not appear to fit in with the historical context of the events around Jerusalem campaign. The Greek historian, Herodotus, writing several centuries later, brings an Egyptian folk account of mice attacking and destroying the Assyrian equipment and triggering a hasty retreat with Egyptian forces in pursuit. None of the explanations are satisfactory as can be seen by the ongoing discussions. Several scholars have even given up any hope of clarifying the issue unless some new as yet undiscovered documentation would be forthcoming. Scouring the Middle East of the period for another explanation of the rescue of Jerusalem, the author suggests considering the only other force capable of challenging Assyria with any super-power credentials. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œWestern journal of black studiesSame topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207